Skip to main content

Translate

Our Recent Post

Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Bill, 2025 - Analysis

The Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Bill, 2025 In September 2025 the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly passed the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Bill, 2025 — a far-reaching statute that criminalises conversions carried out by “force, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, allurement, or by marriage”, and that attaches very heavy criminal and administrative penalties to such acts. The Bill has already provoked political heat, street protests and urgent legal debate because of its combination of draconian punishments, procedural obligations on persons who wish to convert, and exemptions that critics say skew its effect. www.ndtv.com Short legislative history & headline facts Passed: By voice vote in the Rajasthan Assembly in early September 2025.  Core criminality: Conversion obtained by force, fraud, inducement/allurement, undue influence, misrepresentation or marriage is an offence. PRS Legislative Research Major pe...

Latest Judgements - March 04, 2025

 


SC: Conviction Based Solely on Handwriting Expert’s Opinion Without Corroboration is Risky

Latest Judgements - March 04, 2025In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India in C. Kamalakkannan v. State of Tamil Nadu (2025 INSC 309) has held that convicting an accused based solely on a handwriting expert’s opinion, without any corroborative evidence, is legally unsound and hazardous.

Case Background

The case revolved around allegations of forgery, where the prosecution heavily relied on a handwriting expert’s analysis to establish the accused’s involvement. However, no independent corroborative evidence was presented to support the claim. Despite this, the trial court and the High Court convicted the accused based primarily on the expert’s testimony.

Supreme Court’s Observations

The Apex Court reiterated that while expert opinions can be valuable in judicial proceedings, they cannot be the sole basis for conviction. The Court emphasized the following key principles:

  • Expert testimony requires corroboration – A handwriting expert’s opinion, like any forensic evidence, is not fool proof and must be supported by independent evidence.
  • Caution in relying on forensic opinions – Courts must be mindful that scientific analyses, including handwriting examinations, are susceptible to errors.
  • Holistic evaluation of evidence – Conviction must be based on a comprehensive assessment of all available evidence rather than relying entirely on expert testimony.

Verdict and Legal Precedent

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant’s conviction, reinforcing the well-established legal position that forensic opinions should aid the judicial process but not be the sole deciding factor in a criminal trial. This ruling serves as a vital precedent, ensuring that expert opinions are used responsibly in the justice system.

This judgment once again highlights the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the principle of fair trial and preventing wrongful convictions based on uncorroborated forensic testimony.

Latest Judgements - March 04, 2025

Stay tuned with the Lex Regula Latest Judgements for latest updates!



Comments

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Search in Wikipedia

Search results

Total Visits